For over a decade, Vijay Mallya has lived under the unrelenting spotlight of public scrutiny. Dubbed “The King of Good Times,” the once-celebrated businessman’s transformation from flamboyant tycoon to alleged fugitive has been splashed across headlines, debated on prime-time news, and dissected in social media threads. But with changing facts, recovered debts, and shifting global perspectives, a new debate emerges: has public opinion been misled?
The spectacle around Mallya began when Kingfisher Airlines ceased operations in 2012 and defaulted on loans exceeding ₹9,000 crore. Critics painted Mallya as a poster boy of crony capitalism. Images of him attending Formula One races and hosting lavish parties clashed with reports of unpaid salaries and mounting debts. “It was easy to vilify him — he symbolized excess,” said brand strategist Priya Bansal.
But as the dust begins to settle, so do the facts.
In the years since his departure from India in 2016, Indian banks and investigative agencies have recovered over ₹14,100 crore from his assets — more than the loan amount itself. According to financial analysts, this includes the monetization of Mallya’s shareholdings, real estate, and other attached properties. “When recoveries exceed liabilities, it’s worth asking whether continued legal action is proportionate,” said a senior banker.
And yet, the public image of Mallya has remained stubbornly negative. Analysts blame this partly on years of aggressive media coverage that painted Mallya as an economic outlaw without examining the systemic issues that enabled such large loans in the first place. “Very little attention was given to the role of banks, lax oversight, and poor aviation policy,” said a journalist. “It became convenient to make Mallya the sole villain.”
A psychologist argues that Mallya's case became a form of collective catharsis. “In a country grappling with corruption and inequality, people want to see someone held accountable. Mallya, with his larger-than-life persona, became the lightning rod.”
However, new voices — particularly among youth and legal commentators — are calling for nuance. A recent survey by India Today found that 46% of urban Indians now believe Mallya deserves a fair chance to present his side of the story, especially given the full or partial recoveries. “It's time we stop trial by media and return to the basics of justice,” wrote lawyer on X.
Even in the UK, where Mallya currently resides, the case has raised eyebrows. British courts have questioned India’s prison conditions and handling of the extradition process. Legal experts have pointed out that Mallya’s human rights cannot be dismissed simply to satisfy public anger.
Mallya, for his part, remains defiant. “I have always maintained my innocence and asked for a fair hearing,” he said in a recent video message. “If justice matters, it must apply to all — not just to satisfy a narrative.”
As India continues its legal battle to bring him back, the question is no longer just about one man’s guilt or innocence. It is about how public sentiment, policy failure, and media frenzy can shape — or distort — the course of justice.
About The Author
.jpg)
